bridge_position - The full bridge position, it requires that the receiver's upper body to be supported typically by their arms, but applies to any similar position where the character's body is lifted off of the resting surface and the angle becomes mostly horizontal (neutral).arch_position - The partial bridge position, it is named arch because this position's downward angle is more inclined causing a character's back to arch.These positions are all very closely related. It is not yet decided whether these variations should be kept separate or be included in this tag. missionary_position - Most examples will be kneeling making them incompatible with typical missionary positions.This tag should probably be used instead unless the position closely resembles the criteria for anvil position.

anvil_position - The guard position may be similar to anvil, but the anvil position does not typically involve raised hips.amazon_position - The receiving / penetrated partner switches positions, and becomes the kneeling / crouching / standing partner instead.Depending on the penetration angle, this may or may not involve lying. The receiving partner's body should be positioned at a downward angle from their partner, but not so severe that their back arches.įor tagging purposes, a character is only considered lying if the bulk of their torso is touching a surface. Guard position is a front entry sexual position featuring the giving partner in a kneeling position, while supporting or lifting the hips of the receiving partner off of the ground or resting surface. We still have a Discord server, come talk to us! Please, help us get the word out by letting others know about this issue.įor some further information on what the bill does have a look at If want to help us ensure that this site can continue to serve you without being required to know who you are, please ask the Arizona governor to veto this bill. Unfortunately, Arizona is the state out of which e621 operates, which means that this law will almost certainly affect us if it is to pass. This is not only a major violation of privacy, but it also opens up a very real danger of identity theft through phishing schemes and other methods, not to mention that we would not be able to control any of that information to make sure it is permanently deleted after age verification is complete. Such system would be required to go through third party vendors, who in turn must go through a government database to verify every user's age.

April 2nd: The politicians in Arizona are about to sign into law a bill that would mandate sites like e621 to either impose age verification on all users or be at a risk of lawsuits.

E621 anvil position